Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 231-237 , March 2007

Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings

  • Flávio Fernando Demarco

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, RS, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, UFPel, Rua Gonçalves Chaves, 457, 5° andar, CEP 96015 560, Pelotas, RS, Brazil. Tel.: +55 5332224439; fax: +55 53 32255581.
    • ,
  • Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci

      Affiliations

    • Graduate Program in Dentistry, Cariology Area, Faculty of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
    • ,
  • Fábio Garcia Lima

      Affiliations

    • Graduate Program in Dentistry, Operative Dentistry Area, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, RS, Brazil
    • ,
  • Tiago Aurélio Donassollo

      Affiliations

    • Graduate Program in Dentistry, Operative Dentistry Area, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, RS, Brazil
    • ,
  • Dárvi de Almeida André

      Affiliations

    • Undergraduate Students School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, RS, Brazil
    • ,
  • Ferdinan Luís Leida

      Affiliations

    • Undergraduate Students School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, RS, Brazil

Received 20 March 2006 ,Revised 25 July 2006 ,Accepted 29 July 2006.

References 

  1. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguercio AD, Demarco FF. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34(7):427–435
  2. Wilder AD, May KN, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 1999;11:135–142
  3. Köhler B, Rasmusson C-G, Ödman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 2000;28:111–116
  4. Mjör IA. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence International. 1998;29:313–317
  5. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. Journal of Dentistry. 2001;29:317–324
  6. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative Dentistry. 2004;29:481–508
  7. Wilson NH. The evaluation of materials: relationships between laboratory investigations and clinical studies. Operative Dentistry. 1990;15:149–155
  8. Keogh TP, Bertolotti RL. Creating tight, anatomically correct interproximal contacts. Dental Clinics of North America. 2001;45:83–102
  9. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Asscherickx K, Simon S, Abe Y, Lambrechts P, et al. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts?. Dental Materials. 2001;17:533–541
  10. Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk RC, Dorfer CE. A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34:292–297
  11. Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. Journal of Dentistry. 1998;26:555–562
  12. Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B, Oldenburg TR. Improved proximal margim adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence International. 1986;17:659–664
  13. Lösche GM. Marginal adaptation of Class II composite fillings: guided polymerization vs reduced light intensity. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 1999;1:31–39
  14. Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Carvalho RM. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:603–610
  15. Prakki A, Cilli R, Saad JO, Rodrigues JR. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations. Quintessence International. 2004;35:785–789
  16. Mullejans R, Badawi MO, Raab WH, Lang H. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded class II resin composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2003;28:122–126
  17. Verluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light?. Journal of Dental Research. 1998;77:1435–1445
  18. Cenci MS, Lund RG, Pereira CL, de Carvalho RM, Demarco FF. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2006;8:127–132
  19. Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Pereira CL, Lund RG, Carvalho RM. One year clinical comparison of metal and translucent matrices in Class II resin composite restorations. American Journal of Dentistry, in press.
  20. Burke FJT, Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (part 4): influence of time and place. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:837–847
  21. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2003;7:63–70
  22. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food—simulating solutions and finsh on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2005;33:389–398
  23. Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness, and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2006;31:11–17
  24. Wilson MA, Cowan AJ, Randall RC, Crisp RJ, Wilson NH. A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results. Operative Dentistry. 2002;27:423–429
  25. Bayne SC, Schmatz G. Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2005;9:1–6
  26. Wendt SL, Ziemiecki TL, Leinfelder KF. Proximal wear rates by tooth position of resin composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 1996;24:33–39
  27. Turkun LS, Aktener BO. Twenty-four-month clinical evaluation of different posterior composite resin materials. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2001;132:196–203
  28. Fano L, Fano V, Ma WY, Wang XG, Zhu F. Adhesiveness of dental resin-based restorative materials investigated with atomic force microscopy. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials. 2005;73:35–42
  29. Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Pashley DH, Peters MC, Lai SC, Yiu CK, et al. Aging affects two modes of nanoleakage expression in bonded dentin. Journal of Dental Research. 2003;82:537–541
  30. Hayashi M, Wilson NH. Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensitivity. Operative Dentistry. 2003;28:681–688

PII: S0300-5712(06)00158-8

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.011

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 231-237 , March 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution