Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 201-206, March 2007

An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins

  • Nurit Beyth

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, P.O. Box 12272, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
  • ,
  • Abraham J. Domb

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Natural Products, School of Pharmacy-Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
    • Affiliated with the Alex Gross Center for Drug Design and Synthesis and the David R. Bloom Center for Pharmaceutical Research at The Hebrew University, Lionel Jacobson Chair in Medicinal Chemistry.
  • ,
  • Ervin I. Weiss

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, P.O. Box 12272, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +972 2 6776142; fax: +972 2 6429683.

Received 5 April 2006; received in revised form 13 July 2006; accepted 22 July 2006.

Abstract 

Objectives

Antibacterial properties of restorative dental materials such as amalgam and composite resins may improve the restorative treatment outcome. This study evaluates the antibacterial properties of three composite resins: Z250, Tetric Ceram, P60 and a dental amalgam in vitro.

Methods

Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus served as test microorganisms. Three quantitative microtiter spectrophotometric assays were used to evaluate the effect of the restorative materials on: (i) early-stage biofilm using a direct contact test (DCT); (ii) planktonic bacterial growth; (iii) bacterial growth in the materials’ elute. For comparison purposes, agar diffusion test (ADT) was also performed.

Results

The effect of the composite resins on bacterial growth was minimal and limited to a few days only. One-week-aged composites promoted growth of S. mutans and A. viscosus. The antibacterial properties in direct contact were more potent than in planktonic bacterial growth. Amalgam showed complete inhibition of both bacteria in all phases, and the effect lasted for at least 1 week. The materials’ elute had no effect on both bacterial growth with the exception of complete inhibition of S. mutans in amalgam. The later results correlated with the ADT.

Conclusions

The present findings demonstrate potent and lasting antibacterial properties of amalgam, which are lacking in composite resins. This may explain the clinical observation of biofilm accumulated more on composites compared to amalgams. It follows that the assessment of antibacterial properties of poorly-soluble materials has to employ more than one assay.

Keywords: Antibacterial activity, Composite resins, Dental amalgam, Direct contact test

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(06)00152-7

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.009

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 201-206, March 2007