Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 156-162 , February 2007

Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: A retrospective study

Received 24 January 2006 ,Revised 28 June 2006 ,Accepted 7 July 2006.

References 

  1. Mount GJ, Ngo H. Minimal intervention: a new concept for operative dentistry. Quintessence International. 2000;31:527–533
  2. Naasan MA, Watson TF. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. American Journal of Dentistry. 1998;11:36–45
  3. Eliades G. Chemical and biological properties of glass-ionomer cements. In:  Davidson CL,  Mjör IA editor. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1999;p. 85–101
  4. Gao W, Smales RJ, Yip HK. Demineralisation and remineralisation of dentine caries, and the role of glass-ionomer cements. International Dental Journal. 2000;50:51–56
  5. Gao W, Smales RJ, Gale MS. Fluoride release/uptake from newer glass-ionomer cements used with the ART approach. American Journal of Dentistry. 2000;13:201–204
  6. Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Eliades G. In vivo and in vitro anticariogenic behavior of glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. Dental Materials. 2002;18:561–569
  7. Kielbassa AM, Schulte-Monting J, Garcia-Godoy F, Meyer-Lueckel H. Initial in situ secondary caries formation: effect of various fluoride-containing restorative materials. Operative Dentistry. 2003;28:765–772
  8. Hübel S, Méjare I. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for class-II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2003;13:2–8
  9. Quist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2004;62:37–45
  10. Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2000;58:97–101
  11. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2001;3:45–64
  12. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general practice. International Dental Journal. 2000;50:361–368
  13. Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan KP. New trends in glass-ionomer chemistry. Biomaterials. 1998;19:479–483
  14. Gao W, Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip KH. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Quintessence International. 2003;34:31–37
  15. Yip KH, Smales RJ, Gao W, Peng D. The effects of two cavity preparation methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: an evaluation after 12 months. Journal of American Dental Association. 2002;133:744–751
  16. Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, Van’t Hof MA, Truin GJ. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years. Caries Research. 2002;36:437–444
  17. Burke TFJ, Wilson NHF. Glass-ionomer restorations in stress-bearing and difficult-to-access cavities. In:  Davidson CL,  Mjör IA editor. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1999;p. 253–268
  18. Ferrari M. Use of glass-ionomers as bondings, linings, or bases. In:  Davidson CL,  Mjör IA editor. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1999;p. 137–148
  19. Lo ECM, Luo Y, Fan MW, Wei SHY. Clinical investigation of two glass-ionomer restoratives used with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in China: two-years results. Caries Research. 2001;35:458–463
  20. Yip HK, Smales RJ, Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Quintessence International. 2002;33:17–21
  21. Smales RJ, Yip HK. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries. Quintessence International. 2002;33:427–432
  22. Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2002;27:528–534
  23. Andersson-Wenckert IE, Van Dijken JWV, Kieri C. Durability of extensive class-II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after six years. American Journal of Dentistry. 2004;17:43–50
  24. Leirskar J, Nordbø H, Mount GJ, Ngo H. The influence of resin coating on the shear punch strength of a high strength auto-cure glass ionomer. Dental Materials. 2003;19:87–91
  25. Kleverlaan CJ, Van Duinen RN, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by different curing methods. Dental Materials. 2004;20:45–50

PII: S0300-5712(06)00131-X

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.07.006

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 156-162 , February 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution