Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 124-129 , February 2007

Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities

  • Anders Lindberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Odontology, Dental School Umeå, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +46 91010429.
    • ,
  • Jan W.V. van Dijken

      Affiliations

    • Department of Odontology, Dental School Umeå, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
    • ,
  • M. Lindberg

      Affiliations

    • Public Dental Health Clinic Seminariegatan, Skellefteå, Sweden

Received 27 April 2006 ,Revised 8 June 2006 ,Accepted 13 June 2006.

References 

  1. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. Journal of Dentistry. 1997;25:435–440
  2. Dauvillier BS, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Visco-elastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting. Journal of Dental Research. 2000;79:818–823
  3. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. Journal of Dental Research. 1984;63:146–148
  4. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoratives. Journal of Dental Research. 1987;66:1636–1639
  5. Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrety of restoration-cavity interface. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1995;103:322–326
  6. Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P. Interfacial adaptation of a class II polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restoration in vivo. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2000;58:77–84
  7. Dietrich T, Losche AC, Losche GM, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine. Journal of Dentistry. 1999;27:119–128
  8. Owens BM, Johnson WW. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of class V resin composite restorations. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2005;7:303–308
  9. Ernst CP, Brand N, Frommator U, Rippin G, Willershausen B. Reduction of polymerization shrinkage stress and marginal microleakage using soft-start polymerization. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2003;15:93–103
  10. Knibbs P. The clinical performance of a glass polyalkenoate (glass ionomer) cement used in a “sandwich” technique with a composite resin to restore class II cavities. British Dental Journal. 1992;172:102–107
  11. Davidson CL. Glass ionomer bases under posterior composites. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 1994;6:223–224
  12. van Dijken JW. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontolgica Scandinavica. 1994;52:368–376
  13. Welbury RR, Murray JJ. A clinical trial of the glass ionomer cement-composite resin “sandwich” technique in class II cavities in permanent premolar and molar teeth. Quintessence International. 1990;21:507–512
  14. Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Kieri C. Durability of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years. American Journal of Dentistry. 2004;17:43–50
  15. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence International. 1996;27:203–209
  16. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1998;129:567–577
  17. Bertracchini SM, Abate PF, Blank A, Baglieto MF, Macchi RL. Solubility and fluoride release in ionomers and compomers. Quintessence International. 1999;30:193–197
  18. Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. American Journal of Dentistry. 2003;16:33–36
  19. van Dijken JW. A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microfiller, and hybrid composite resin fillings. A 6-year follow-up study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1986;44:357–367
  20. Isokangas P, Alanen P, Tiekso J. The clinician's ability to identify caries risk subjects without saliva tests-a pilot study. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1993;21:8–10
  21. Seppä L, Hausen H, Pöllänen L, Helasharju K, Kärkkäinen S. Past caries recording made in public dental clinics as predictors of caries prevalence in early adolescence. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1989;17:277–281
  22. Krejci I, Sparr D, Lutz F. A three-sited light curing technique for conventional class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence International. 1987;18:125–131
  23. van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P, Waern R. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: Interfacial adaptation in vivo in class II cavities. American Journal of Dentistry. 1998;11:165–172
  24. van Dijken JW, Kieri C, Carlén M. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Journal of Dental Research. 1999;78:1319–1325
  25. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1990;64:658–664
  26. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence International. 1996;27:203–209
  27. Li Q, Jepsen S, Albers HK, Eberhard J. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in class-V-cavities. Dental Materials. 2006;22:250–257
  28. Dietrisch T, Kraemer M, Losche GM, Wernecke K-D, Roulet J-F. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich class II restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:401–410
  29. Chen HY, Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured compomer restorative materials. Dental Materials. 2003;19:597–602
  30. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R, Gaebler P. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations—a 10-year report. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2004;31:991–1000
  31. Lundin SA, Koch G. Class I and II posterior composite resin restorations after 5 and 10 years. Swedish Dental Journal. 1999;23:165–171
  32. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2003;7:71–79
  33. Rasmusson CG, Lundin SÅ. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: five-year results. Swedish Dental Journal. 1995;19:173–182
  34. Köhler B, Rasmusson C-G, Ödman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of class II composite resin restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 2000;28:111–116
  35. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of class I and class II composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 1997;25:229–232
  36. Perry RD, Kugel G, Habib CM, McGarry P, Settembrini L. A two-year clinical evaluation of TPH for restoration of class II carious lesions in permanent teeth. General Dentistry. 1997;45:344–349
  37. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2001;3:45–64
  38. van Dijken JW, Kalfas S, Litra V, Oliveby A. Fluoride and mutans streptococci levels in plaque on aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, compomer and resin composite. Caries Research. 1997;31:379–383
  39. van Dijken JW. Durability of new restorative materials in class III cavities. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2001;3:65–70

PII: S0300-5712(06)00119-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.06.003

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 124-129 , February 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution