Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 117-123, February 2007

Axial-wall inclination angle and vertical height interactions in molar full crown preparations

  • John F. Bowley

      Affiliations

    • Postdoctoral Prosthodontics Division, Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University, 100 E. Newton St., Boston, MA 02118, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 617 669 6927; fax: +1 617 638 5734.
  • ,
  • Jules Kieser

      Affiliations

    • Oral Sciences Department, Otago University, School of Dentistry, P.O. Box 647, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand

Received 3 March 2006; received in revised form 21 June 2006; accepted 24 June 2006.

Abstract 

Objective

This study has been designed to evaluate the interaction of axial wall heights with inclination angles in full crown tooth preparations. The interaction of these parameters was related to the resulting preparation surface area.

Materials and methods

A right regular pyramid was used to simulate a single mandibular molar preparation with known convergence angles and vertical heights. Various combinations of these two variables allowed the calculation of surface areas with a formula for the area of a pyramid and right triangles through trigonometric manipulations. The pyramidal model system had a 9-mm square base with vertical heights from 3- to 5-mm and single-side inclination angles from 2 to 25°. The occlusal surface was a flat, square or rectangular surface and was included in the total area.

Results

A percentage of surface area lost or gained served as the dependent variables. The significance levels were set at 10.0% or greater magnitude of loss/gain in a surface area compared to the ideal 2°-level. Significant area loss was demonstrated in all α-level comparisons. The largest change was found in the 5-mm height grouping compared to the 3-mm height grouping, −36.6% difference between groups at the 2°-level.

Conclusions

Axial single-side inclination angles greater than 10° in 3- and 4-mm height-molars are detrimental to maximum surface area in full crown restorations. The 5-mm axial wall height with ≤10° single wall has been shown to maximize the luting agent surface area between restoration and tooth structure.

Keywords: Resistance form, Axial-wall inclination, Surface area, Interaction, Fixed prosthodontic restoration

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(06)00110-2

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2006.06.002

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 117-123, February 2007