Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 104-108 , February 2007

The long-term effect of a composite resin restoration on proximal contact tightness

Received 14 February 2006 ,Revised 22 May 2006 ,Accepted 29 May 2006.

References 

  1. Abrahams H, Kopczyk RA. Gingival sequela from retained piece of dental floss. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1983;106:57–58
  2. Ash MM. Wheeler's dental anatomy physiology and occlusion. Dental anatomy, physiology, and occlusion. 8th ed.. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003;
  3. Wilder AD, May KN, Strickland WD. Amalgam restorations for classes II cavity preparations. In:  Sturdevant CM,  Roberson TM,  Heymann TM,  Sturdevant JR editor. The art and science of operative dentistry. 3rd ed.. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995;
  4. Hallmon WW, Waldrop TC, Houston GD, Hawkins BF. Flossing clefts. Clinical and histologic observations. Journal of Periodontology. 1986;57:501–504
  5. Dörfer CE. Der Approximalraum. Deutsche Zahnärtzliche Zeitung. 1997;52:151–167[in German; English abstract available]
  6. Loomans BAC, Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk RCW, Dörfer CE. A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites. Journal of Dentistry. 2006;34:292–297
  7. Prakki A, Cilli R, Saad JOC, Rodrigues JR. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of class II esthetic direct restorations. Quintessence International. 2004;35:785–789
  8. Roux D, Woda A. Biometric analysis of tooth migration after approximal contact removal in the rat. Archives of Oral Biology. 1994;39:1023–1027
  9. Moyers RE. Development of dentition and occlusion. Handbook of orthodontics for the student and general practitioner. Chicago: Year Book; 1973;pp. 166–241
  10. Van Beek H. The transfer of mesial drift potential along the dental arch in macaca irus: an experimental study of tooth migration rate related to the horizontal vectors of occlusal forces. European Journal of Orthodontics. 1979;1:125–129
  11. Picton DCA, Moss JP. The effect of reducing cusp height on the rate of approximal drift of cheek teeth in adult monkeys (macaca irus). Archives of Oral Biology. 1978;23:219–221
  12. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. International Dental Journal. 1980;30:347–358
  13. DuBois LM, Niles SM, Boice PA. The magnitude of interproximal spaces between adjacent teeth. American Journal of Dentistry. 1993;6:315–317
  14. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Asscherickx K, Simon S, Abe Y, Lambrechts P, et al. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts?. Dental Materials. 2001;17:533–541
  15. Osborn JW. An investigation into the interdental forces occurring between the teeth of the same arch during clenching the jaws. Archives of Oral Biology. 1961;5:202–211
  16. Southard TE, Behrents RG, Tolley EA. The anterior component of occlusal force. Part 1. Measurement and distribution. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1989;96:493–500
  17. Southard TE, Southard KA, Tolley EA. Variation of approximal tooth contact tightness with postural change. Journal of Dental Research. 1990;69:1776–1779
  18. Dörfer CE, von Bethlenfalvy ER, Staehle HJ, Pioch T. Factors influencing proximal dental contact strengths. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2000;108:368–377
  19. Wendt SL, Ziemiecki TL, Leinfelder KF. Proximal wear rates by tooth position of resin composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 1996;24:33–39
  20. Hancock EB, Mayo CV, Schwab RR, Wirthlin MR. Influence of interdental contacts on periodontal status. Journal of Periodontology. 1980;51:445–449
  21. Jernberg GR, Bakdash MB, Keenan KM. Relationship between proximal tooth open contacts and periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontology. 1983;54:529–533

PII: S0300-5712(06)00107-2

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.05.004

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 35, Issue 2 , Pages 104-108 , February 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution