Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 10 , Pages 790-795 , November 2006

The effect of alveolar bone loss on the load capability of restored endodontically treated teeth: A comparative in vitro study

  • Michael Naumann

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics and Geriatric Dentistry, Charité, Humboldt University, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +49 30 450 562 577; fax: +49 30 450 562 900.
    • ,
  • Martin Rosentritt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Clinics, Regensburg, Germany
    • ,
  • Anja Preuß

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics and Geriatric Dentistry, Charité, Humboldt University, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
    • ,
  • Thomas Dietrich

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Policy and Health Services Research, Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University, Boston, USA

Received 10 February 2006 ,Revised 5 March 2006 ,Accepted 6 March 2006.

References 

  1. Caplan DJ, Kolker J, Rivera EM, Walton RE. Relationship between number of proximal contacts and survival of root canal treated teeth. International Endodontic Journal. 2002;35:193–199
  2. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1989;61:10–15
  3. Iqbal MK, Johansson AA, Akeel RF, Bergenholtz A, Omar R. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with the periapical status of restored, endodontically treated teeth. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2003;16:31–38
  4. Hatzikyriakos AH, Reisis GI, Tsingos N. A 3-year postoperative clinical evaluation of posts and cores beneath existing crowns. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992;67:454–458
  5. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1984;51:780–784
  6. Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002;87:256–263
  7. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford TR. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2002;88:297–301
  8. Decock V, De Nayer K, De Boever JA, Dent M. Eighteen-year longitudinal study of cantilevered fixed restorations. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1996;9:331–340
  9. Eckerbom M, Magnusson T, Martinsson T. Prevalence of apical periodontitis, crowned teeth and teeth with posts in a Swedish population. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology. 1991;7:214–220
  10. Strub JR, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artificial mouth. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2001;28:120–124
  11. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology. 1985;1:108–111
  12. Howe CA, McKendry DJ. Effect of endodontic access preparation on resistance to crown-root fracture. Journal of American Dental Association. 1990;121:712–715
  13. Panitvisai P, Messer HH. Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures. Journal of Endodontics. 1995;21:57–61
  14. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2001;14:355–363
  15. Vire DE. Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classification and evaluation. Journal of Endodontics. 1991;17:338–342
  16. Nyman S, Lindhe J. A longitudinal study of combined periodontal and prosthetic treatment of patients with advanced periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontology. 1979;50:163–169
  17. Reinhardt RA, Krejci RF, Pao YC, Stannard JG. Dentin stresses in post-reconstructed teeth with diminishing bone support. Journal of Dental Research. 1983;62:1002–1008
  18. Stiefenhofer A, Hackhofer T. Biomechanics of endodontic post and core on periodontally impaired tooth. Zahnärztliche Welt Rundschau. 1996;105:703–709
  19. Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2001;14:58–64
  20. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. Journal of Dentistry. 2001;29:427–433
  21. Krejci I, Lutz F. In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results. Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin. 1990;100:1445–1449
  22. Bolhuis P, de Gee A, Feilzer A. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars. Quintessence International. 2004;35:657–667
  23. Prosthodontics, TNCotAo. The glossary of prosthodontic terms, 6 ed. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1994; 71:72.
  24. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17:135–141
  25. Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC. Effect of tooth preparation height and diameter on the resistance of complete crowns to fatigue loading. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1997;10:207–215
  26. Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Pröschel P. Evaluation of load testing of postendodontic restorations in vitro: compressive loading, gradual cycling loading and chewing simulation. Journal of Biomedical Material Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2005;74B:829–834
  27. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. Journal of Dentistry. 1999;27:275–278
  28. Kinney JH, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The mechanical properties of human dentin: a critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature. Critical Review in Oral Biology and Medicine. 2003;14:13–29
  29. Pest BL, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dental Materials. 2002;18:596–602
  30. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dental Materials. 2004;20:963–971
  31. Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, Monticelli F, Raffaelli O, Cardoso PC, et al. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2004;112:353–361
  32. Paphangkorakit J, Osborn JW. The effect of pressure on a maximum incisal bite force in man. Archives of Oral Biology. 1997;42:11–17
  33. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1994;71:565–567
  34. Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1989;61:535–543
  35. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17:369–376
  36. Ko CC, Chu CS, Chung KH, Lee MC. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992;68:421–427
  37. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA, Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1997;78:10–14

PII: S0300-5712(06)00064-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.03.003

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 10 , Pages 790-795 , November 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution