Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 10 , Pages 763-769 , November 2006

Fiber-reinforced packable resin composites in Class II cavities

  • Jan W.V. van Dijken

      Affiliations

    • Dental Hygienist Education, Department of Odontology, Dental School, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +46 90 7856034; fax: +46 90 770580.
    • ,
  • Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cariology, Dental School Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

Received 13 January 2006 ,Revised 20 February 2006 ,Accepted 23 February 2006.

References 

  1. Mjör IA. Amalgam and composite resin restorations: longevity and reasons for replacement. In:  Anusavice K editors. Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence; 1989;p. 61–80
  2. Andersson-Wenckert I, van Dijken JWV, Kieri C. The durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after six years. American Journal of Dentistry. 2004;17:43–50
  3. van Dijken JWV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. Journal of Dentistry. 2000;28:299–306
  4. Jokstad A, Mjör IA, Qvist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1994;52:234–242
  5. Choi KK, Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ, Charlton D. Properties of packable dental composites. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 2000;12:216–226
  6. Manhart J, Kunzelman KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behaviour of light-cured packable composite resins. Dental Materials. 2000;16:33–40
  7. Peumans M, van Meerbeek B, Asscherickx K, Simon S, Abe Y, Lambrechts P, et al. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts?. Dental Materials. 2001;17:533–541
  8. Ernst C-P, Martin M, Stuff S, Willershausen B. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2001;5:148–155
  9. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE, Busato AL. One-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2001;26:427–434
  10. Oberländer H, Hiller K-A, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Clinical evaluation of packable composite resins in Class-II restorations. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2001;5:102–107
  11. Barbosa de Souza F, Guimarães RP, Silva CHV. A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: one-year report. Quintessence International. 2005;36:41–48
  12. Leinfelder KJ, Bayne S, Swift EJ. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 1999;11:234–249
  13. van Dijken JWV. A clincial evaluation of anterior conventional, microfiller and hybrid composite resin fillings. A six year follow up study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1986;44:357–367
  14. van Dijken JWV. Three-year performance of a calcium-, fluoride- and hydroxyl ions releasing resin composite. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2002;60:155–159
  15. van Dijken JWV, Kieri C, Carlén M. Longevity of extensive Class II open sandwich restorations with a resin-modified GIC-composite. Journal of Dental Research. 1999;78:1319–1325
  16. Isokangas P, Alanen P, Tiekso J. The clinician's ability to identify caries risk subjects without saliva tests—a pilot study. Community Dentistry Oral Epidemiology. 1993;21:8–10
  17. Seppä L, Hausen H, Pöllänen L, Helasharju K, Karkkainen S. Past caries recording made in Public Dental Clinics as predictors of caries prevalence in early adolescence. Community Dental Oral Epidemiology. 1989;17:277–281
  18. Siegel S. Non parametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1956;
  19. van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K. A two-year clinical evaluation of a new calcium aluminate cement in Class II cavities. Acta Odontoliga Scandinavica. 2003;61:235–240
  20. Dyer SR. Fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial denture design. Mechanical properties of the composite and loading bearing capacity. Thesis Turku University, Finland 2005.
  21. Kelsey WP, Latta MA, Shaddy RS, Stanislaw CM. Physical properties of three packable resin-composites restorative materials. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:331–335
  22. Xu HH. Dental composite resins containing silica-fused ceramic single-crystalline whiskers with various filler levels. Journal of Dental Research. 1999;78:1304–1311
  23. Kelly JR. Perspectives on strength. Dental Materials. 1995;11:103–110
  24. Ritter JE. Predicting lifetime of materials and material structures. Dental Materials. 1995;11:142–146
  25. Ritter JE. Critique of test methods for lifetime predictions. Dental Materials. 1995;11:147–151
  26. Price RB, Doyle G, Murphy D. Effect of composite thickness on the shear bond strength to dentin. Journal of Canadian Dental Association. 2000;66:35–39
  27. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. Journal of Dentistry. 1989;17:S10–S17
  28. Culy G, Tyas MJ. Direct resin-bonded, fibre-reinforced anterior bridges. A clinical report. Australian Dental Journal. 1998;43:1–4
  29. Drummond JL, King TJ, Bapna MS, Koperski RD. Mechanical property evaluation of pressable restorative ceramics. Dental Materials. 2000;16:226–233
  30. van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K. A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in Class II cavities. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2005;7:343–349
  31. Callaghan DJ, Vaziri A, Nayeb-Hashemi H. Effect of fiber volume fraction and length on the wear characteristics of glass fiber-reinforced dental composites. Dental Materials. 2006;22:84–91
  32. ADA American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Acceptance program guidelines restorative materials, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1996.
  33. ADA American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Acceptance program guidelines resin based composites for posterior restorations, Chicago, Ill, March 2001.
  34. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2001;3:185–194
  35. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2001;3:45–64
  36. El-Mowafy OM, Lewis DW, Benmergui C, Levinton C. Meta-analysis on long-term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 1994;22:33–43
  37. Opdam NJM, Loomans BAC, Roeters FJM, Bronkhorst EM. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. Journal of Dentistry. 2004;32:379–383
  38. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 1997;25:229–232
  39. Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2003;7:63–70
  40. Lindberg A, van Dijken JWV, Lindberg M. A 3 year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in class II cavities. American Journal of Dentistry. 2003;16:33–36
  41. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE, Busato AL. One year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2001;26:427–434
  42. Lopes LG, Cefaly DFG, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL, Lauris JRP, Navarro MFL. Clinical evaluation of two “packable” posterior composite resins. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2002;6:79–83
  43. Perry RD, Kugel G. Two-year clinical evaluation of a high-density posterior restorative material. Compendium Continuing Education Dentistry. 2000;21:1067–1072
  44. Perry RD, Kugel G, Habib CM, McGarry P, Settembrini L. A two-year clinical evaluation of TPH for restoration of Class II carious lesions in permanent teeth. General Dentistry. 1997;45:344–349
  45. Schoch M, Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Petschelt A. Direct posterior composite restorations with a new adhesive system: one-year results. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 1999;2:167–173
  46. Wilson MA, Cowan AJ, Randall RC, Crisp RJ, Wilson NHF. A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results. Operative Dentistry. 2002;27:423–429

PII: S0300-5712(06)00050-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.02.003

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 10 , Pages 763-769 , November 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution