Clinical performance of posterior metal-free polymer crowns with and without fiber reinforcement: One-year results of a randomised clinical trial

Ohlmann, Brigitte; Dreyhaupt, Jens; Schmitter, Marc; Gabbert, Olaf; Hassel, Alexander; Rammelsberg, Peter

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2006.02.001

« Previous Next »Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 10 , Pages 757-762, November 2006

Clinical performance of posterior metal-free polymer crowns with and without fiber reinforcement:

One-year results of a randomised clinical trial

Brigitte Ohlmann
- Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 6221 568799; fax: +49 6221 561775.
Jens Dreyhaupt
- Department of Medical Biometry and Informatic science, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
Marc Schmitter
- Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
Olaf Gabbert
- Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
Alexander Hassel
- Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
Peter Rammelsberg
- Department of Prosthodontics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg 69120, Germany

Received 24 November 2005; received in revised form 12 February 2006; accepted 15 February 2006.

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of posterior, metal-free polymer crowns with and without a glass-fiber framework, in comparison to metal–ceramic crowns.

Methods

After randomisation, 80 single crowns, manufactured from a newly designed polymer composite, were set in posterior teeth. Half of these received a glass-fiber framework, while half were prepared without any framework stabilisation. All polymer crowns were adhesively luted with resin cement. As the control group, 40 conventional metal–ceramic crowns were inserted with hybrid cement. Documentation included failures and other complications, as well as gingival/plaque status and aesthetic performance.

Results

During the 12-month observation period, eight polymer crowns and three metal–ceramic crowns showed clinically relevant complications. The most frequent complications were root canal treatments (n=4) and decementation (n=4) of the crowns. A total of two crowns (one polymer crown with fiber network and one crown of the control group) had to be replaced.

After 12 months, polymer crowns with glass-fiber framework exhibited significantly higher plaque accumulation (p=0.005) and gingival index (p=0.04) than metal–ceramic crowns, while no significant differences could be demonstrated for polymer crowns without fiber reinforcement.

Postoperative sensibility and aesthetic performance did not differ significantly between the groups.

Conclusions

Within a 12-month observation period, posterior polymer crowns with and without glass-fiber framework demonstrated acceptable stability and aesthetic performance.

Polymer crowns with fiber framework showed significant higher plaque accumulation and gingival index than metal–ceramic crowns.

Keywords: Reinforced, Non-reinforced, Posterior, Polymer, Crowns, Clinical, Randomised, Plaque, Gingival index