Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 8 , Pages 588-597 , September 2006

Interaction between GIC and S. sanguis biofilms: Antibacterial properties and changes of surface hardness

  • C. Hengtrakool

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, 90112, Thailand
    • ,
  • G.J. Pearson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomaterials in relation to Dentistry, St. Bartholomew's and Royal London Medical and Dental school, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 20 7882 7977; fax: +44 20 7882 7977.
    • ,
  • M. Wilson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Microbiology, Eastman Dental Institute, 256 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LD, UK

Received 5 October 2004 ,Accepted 2 February 2005.

References 

  1. de Araujo FB, Garcia-Godoy F, Cury JA, Conceicao EN. Fluoride release from fluoride-containing materials. Operative Dentistry. 1996;21:185–190
  2. Vaikuntam J. Fluoride varnishes: should we be using them?. Pediatric Dentistry. 2000;22:513–516
  3. Christensen GJ. The need for caries-preventive restorative materials. Journal of American Dental Association. 2000;131:1347–1349
  4. Wandera A, Spencer P, Bohaty B. In vitro comparative fluoride release, and weight and volume change in light-curing and self-curing glass ionomer materials. Pediatric Dentistry. 1996;18:210–214
  5. Suljak JP, Hatibovic-Kofman S. A fluoride release–adsorption–release system applied to fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Quintessence International. 1996;27:635–638
  6. Fejerskov O, Thylstrup A, Larsen MJ. Rational use of fluorides in caries prevention. A concept based on possible cariostatic mechanisms. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1981;39:241–249
  7. Thylstrup A, Bruun C, Holmen L. In vivo caries models–mechanisms for caries initiation and arrestment. Advances in Dental Research. 1994;8:144–157
  8. Castioni NV, Baehni PC, Gurny R. Current status in oral fluoride pharmacokinetics and implications for the prophylaxis against dental caries. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 1998;45:101–111
  9. Cox SD, Lassiter MO, Miller BS, Doyle RJ. A new mechanism of action of fluoride on streptococci. Biochemica et Biophysica Acta. 1999;1428:415–423
  10. ten Cate JM, van Loveren C. Fluoride mechanisms. Dental Clinics of North America. 1999;43:713–742vii
  11. Bowden GH. Effects of fluoride on the microbial ecology of dental plaque. Journal of Dental Research. 1990;69(Spec No.):653–659
  12. Van Loveren C. The antimicrobial action of fluoride and its role in caries inhibition. Journal of Dental Research. 1990;69(Spec No.):676–681
  13. Guha-Chowdhury N, Clark AG, Sissons CH. Inhibition of purified enolases from oral bacteria by fluoride. Oral Microbiology and Immunology. 1997;12:91–97
  14. Tatevossian A. Fluoride in dental plaque and its effects. Journal of Dental Research. 1990;69(Spec No.):645–652
  15. Duguid R, Senior BW. The effect of fluoride on Streptococcus sanguis 7863 IGA1 protease production and activity. Archives of Oral Biology. 1997;42:821–825
  16. Wilson M. Susceptibility of oral bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial agents. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 1996;44:79–87
  17. Larsen T, Fiehn NE. Resistance of Streptococcus sanguis biofilms to antimicrobial agents. APMIS: Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica, et Immunologica Scandinavica. 1996;104:280–284
  18. Gilbert P, Das J, Foley I. Biofilm susceptibility to antimicrobials. Advances in Dental Research. 1997;11:160–167
  19. Marsh PD. The role of microbiology in models of dental caries. Advances in Dental Research. 1995;9:244–254
  20. Marsh PD. Microbiologic aspects of dental plaque and dental caries. Dental Clinics of North America 1999; 43:599–614.
  21. Brown MR, Gilbert P. Sensitivity of biofilms to antimicrobial agents. The Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 1993;74(Suppl.):87S–97S
  22. Sissons CH. Artificial dental plaque biofilm model systems. Advances in Dental Research. 1997;11:110–126
  23. Hengtrakool C, Pearson GJ, Wilson M. Antibacterial effect of glass-ionomer cement substratum on S. sanguis biofilms. Journal of Dental Research 1999; 78(special issue): 227–7.
  24. Hengtrakool C, Pearson GJ. Roughness of glass-inomer cement, hydroxyapatite using 3D technique. Journal of Dental Research 1999; 78(5) 1074–4.
  25. Pratten J, Barnett P, Wilson M. Composition and susceptibility to chlorhexidine of multispecies biofilms of oral bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1998;64:3515–3519
  26. Wilson M, Kpendema H, Noar JH, Hunt N, Mordan NJ. Corrosion of intra-oral magnets in the presence and absence of biofilms of Streptococcus sanguis. Biomaterials. 1995;16:721–725
  27. Li YH, Bowden GH. The effect of environmental pH and fluoride from the substratum on the development of biofilms of selected oral bacteria. Journal of Dental Research. 1994;73:1615–1626
  28. Seppa L, Korhonen A, Nuutinen A. Inhibitory effect on S. mutans by fluoride-treated conventional and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1995;103:182–185
  29. Fischman SA, Tinanoff N. The effect of acid and fluoride release on the antimicrobial properties of four glass ionomer cements. Pediatric Dentistry. 1994;16:368–370
  30. Meiers JC, Miller GA. Antibacterial activity of dentin bonding systems, resin-modified glass ionomers, and polyacid-modified composite resins. Operative Dentistry. 1996;21:257–264
  31. Thrower Y, Pinney RJ, Wilson M. Susceptibilities of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans biofilms to oral antiseptics. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 1997;46:425–429
  32. Embleton JV, Newman HN, Wilson M. Influence of growth mode and sucrose on susceptibility of Streptococcus sanguis to amine fluorides and amine fluoride–inorganic fluoride combinations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1998;64:3503–3506
  33. Gilbert P, Allison GD. Biofilms and their resistance towards to antimicrobial agents. In: Newman HN, Wilson M, editors. Dental plaque revisited oral biofilms in health and disease. Proceedings of a conference held at the Royal College of Physician. London: Eastman Dental Institute, University College; 1999 [Bioline].
  34. Bowden GH. The role of microbiology in models of dental caries: reaction paper. Advances in Dental Research. 1995;9:255–269
  35. Robert SK, Bass C, Brading M, Lappin-Scott H, Stoodley P. Biofilm formation and structure: What's new? In: Newman HN, Wilson M, editors. Dental plaque revisited oral biofilms in health and disease, Proceedings of a conference held at the Royal College of Physician. London: Eastman Dental Institute, University College; 1999 [Bioline].
  36. Wilson M, Pratten J. Laboratory assessment of antimicrobials for plaque-related diseases. In: Newman HN, Wilson M, editors. Dental plaque revisited oral biofilms in health and disease. Proceedings of a conference held at the Royal College of Physician. London: Eastman Dental Institute, University College; 1999 [Bioline].
  37. Cisar JO, Takahashi Y, Ruhl S, Donkersloot JA, Sandberg AL. Specific inhibitors of bacterial adhesion: observations from the study of Gram-positive bacteria that initiate biofilm formation on the tooth surface. Advances in Dental Research. 1997;11:168–175
  38. Ellen RP, Lepine G, Nghiem PM. In vitro models that support adhesion specificity in biofilms of oral bacteria. Advances in Dental Research. 1997;11:33–42
  39. Pratten J, Wills K, Barnett P, Wilson M. In vitro studies of the effect of antiseptic-containing mouthwashes on the formation and viability of Streptococcus sanguis biofilms. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 1998;84:1149–1155
  40. Li YH, Bowden GH. Characteristics of accumulation of oral Gram-positive bacteria on mucin-conditioned glass surfaces in a model system. Oral Microbiology and Immunology. 1994;9:1–11
  41. Schilling KM. Bacterial adhesion to hydroxylapatite. Methods in Enzymology. 1995;253:536–542
  42. Forsten L. Fluoride release of glass ionomers. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 1994;6:216–222
  43. Rothwell M, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. The uptake and release of fluoride by ion-leaching cements after exposure to toothpaste. Journal of Dentistry. 1998;26:591–597
  44. Woolford MJ, Grieve AR. Release of fluoride from glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement subjected to radiant heat. Journal of Dentistry. 1995;23:233–237
  45. Kleber CJ, Putt MS. Investigation of the effects of aluminum mouthrinses on rat dental caries and plaque. Caries Research. 1995;29:237–242
  46. Dashper SG, Reynolds EC. Effects of organic acid anions on growth, glycolysis, and intracellular pH of oral streptococci. Journal of Dental Research. 2000;79:90–96
  47. Edwards M, Creanor SL, Foye RH, Gilmour WH. Buffering capacities of soft drinks: the potential influence on dental erosion. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1999;26:923–927
  48. Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B, Limanowska-Shaw H. A preliminary study of the effect of glass-ionomer and related dental cements on the pH of lactic acid storage solutions. Biomaterials. 1999;20:155–158
  49. Kanchanavasita W, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. Long-term surface micro-hardness of resin-modified glass ionomers. Journal of Dentistry. 1998;26:707–712
  50. Gladys S, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Immediate versus one-month wet storage fatigue of restorative materials. Biomaterials. 1998;19:541–544
  51. Kanchanavasita W, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. Water sorption characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials. 1997;18:343–349
  52. Watts DC, Kisumbi BK, Toworfe GK. Dimensional changes of resin/ionomer restoratives in aqueous and neutral media. Dental Materials. 2000;16:89–96
  53. Forss H. Release of fluoride and other elements from light-cured glass ionomers in neutral and acidic conditions. Journal of Dental Research. 1993;72:1257–1262
  54. De Moor RJ, Verbeeck RM. Effect of acetic acid on the fluoride release profiles of restorative glass ionomer cements. Dental Materials. 1998;14:261–268
  55. Billington RW, Williams JA, Pearson GJ. In vitro erosion of 20 commercial glass ionomer cements measured using the lactic acid jet test. Biomaterials. 1992;13:543–547
  56. Williams JA, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. Lactic acid jet test: in vitro erosion rates of glass ionomer dental cements containing radiopacifying elements. Biomaterials. 1993;14:551–555

PII: S0300-5712(06)00034-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.011

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 8 , Pages 588-597 , September 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution