Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 8 , Pages 588-597, September 2006

Interaction between GIC and S. sanguis biofilms: Antibacterial properties and changes of surface hardness

  • C. Hengtrakool

      Affiliations

    • Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, 90112, Thailand
  • ,
  • G.J. Pearson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomaterials in relation to Dentistry, St. Bartholomew's and Royal London Medical and Dental school, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 20 7882 7977; fax: +44 20 7882 7977.
  • ,
  • M. Wilson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Microbiology, Eastman Dental Institute, 256 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LD, UK

Received 5 October 2004; accepted 2 February 2005.

Abstract 

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the interaction of Streptococcus sanguis with two glass-ionomer formulations (GIC:A containing fluoride and GIC:B without fluoride) with particular reference to bacterial growth and changes in hardness of the cement with respect to time.

Materials and methods

Discs of two water activated glass-ionomer cements were prepared according to the manufacturer's instruction. Hydroxyapatite discs (HA) were used as controls. 3D laser scanning technique was used to characterize surface roughness and area of the substrate prior to growing biofilms. Surface hardness was evaluated before and after biofilm growth. A constant depth film fermenter system (CDFF) was used to grow S. sanguis biofilms on the specimens in a similar manner to that described previously by Wilson et al. in 1995. For susceptibility measurement, specimens were removed from CDFF aseptically over periods up to 14d after the first colonization with bacteria. Counts of viable bacterial in the accumulating biofilm layer on each surface were measured and converted to colony forming units per unit surface area. To determine the effect of storage media, hardness discs were exposed to distilled water, lactic acid pH 4, lactic acid pH 5, citric acid pH 5, artificial saliva and S. sanguis biofilms. Twenty-four hours after preparing and subsequent autoclaving, specimens were transferred to a vessel containing 40ml storage medium. The specimens were investigated for periods up to 7d.

Results

The viable counts of S. sanguis per mm2 on GIC:A were significantly less than those on HA and GIC:B during the first 5d (p<0.05). The viable counts of bacteria on the surface of GIC:B were lower during the initial 5d when compared to HA. Exposure of GIC:A and GIC:B to different medium produced softening to the surface of cement. It is apparent that the effects of the biofilms are significantly greater than storage in water but similar to storage in lactic acid pH 5.

Conclusions

This investigation showed that the growth of S. sanguis biofilms were significantly affected by both glass-ionomer formulations, the greater reduction being noted on the surface of the fluoride containing GIC. S. sanguis biofilms produced reduction on the surface hardness of the cement equivalent to that seen after immersion in lactic acid at pH 5. This indicates that while S. sanguis biofilm is affected by the GIC, there is also a decrease in hardness of the cement indicating some cement degradation.

Keywords: Dental materials, Glass-ionomer cement, GIC, Antibacterial properties, S. sanguis biofilms, Bacterial growth, Surface hardness, Fluoride release, Surface degradation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(06)00034-0

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.011

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 8 , Pages 588-597, September 2006