Assessment of the amount of remaining coronal dentine in root-treated teeth

References 

1. Kantor ME, Pines MS. A comparative study of restorative techniques for pulpless teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1977;38:405–412
2. Henry PJ, Bower RC. Secondary intention post and core. Australian Dental Journal. 1977;22:128–131
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
3. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1984;52:28–35
4. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2001;14:355–363
5. Sorensen JA, Engleman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1990;63:529–536
6. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast post and cores and complete crowns. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1995;8:155–161
7. Isidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1999;12:78–82
8. Al-Wahadni A, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro investigation into the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of a tooth restored with a cemented post and partial core restoration. International Endodontic Journal. 2002;35:913–918
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
9. Nyman S, Lindhe JA. Longitudinal study of combined periodontal and prosthetic treatment of patients with advanced periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontology. 1979;50:163–169
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
10. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Endodontically treated teeth as abutments. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1985;53:631–636
11. Randow K, Glantz PO. On cantilever loading of vital and non-vital teeth. An experimental clinical study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1986;44:271–277
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
12. Polansky R, Arnetzl G, Haas M, Keil C, Wimmer G, Lorenzoni M. Residual Dentine thickness after 1.2mm shoulder preparation for Cerec crowns. International Journal of Computers in Dentistry. 2000;3:243–258
13. Seow LL, Toh CG, Wilson NHF. Remaining tooth structure associated with various preparation designs for the endodontically treated maxillary second premolar. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2005;13:57–64
14. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2003;16:39–44
15. Creugers NHJ, Mentink AGM, Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM. 5-Year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2005;18:34–39
16. Nayyar A, Walton R, Leonard L. An amalgam coronal-radicular dowel and core technique for endodontically treated posterior teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1980;43:511–514
17. Christensen GJ. Posts: necessary or unnecessary?. Journal of American Dental Association. 1996;127:1522–1526
18. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1984;51:780–784
19. Kane JJ, Burgess JO, Summitt JB. Fracture resistance of amalgam coronal-radicular restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1990;63:607–613
20. Foley J, Saunders E, Saunders WP. Strength of core build up materials in endodontically treated teeth. American Journal of Dentistry. 1997;10:166–172
    • MEDLINE
21. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
22. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. 1st ed. USA: Chapman & Hall; 1991;p. 404–8 [Reprinted 1999]