Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 9 , Pages 682-691, October 2006

Mechanical interactions of an implant/tooth-supported system under different periodontal supports and number of splinted teeth with rigid and non-rigid connections

  • Chun-Li Lin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate Institute of Medical Mechatronic, Chang Gung University, 259 Wen-Hua 1st Road, Kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan 333, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +886 3 2118800x5759; fax: +886 3 3283031.
  • ,
  • Shih-Hao Chang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Periodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5. Fu-Hsing St. Kuei-Shan, Tao-Yuan 333, Taiwan
    • Tel.: +886 3 3281200x8325; fax: +886 3 3281200x8320.
  • ,
  • Jen-Chyan Wang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100 Shih-Chuan 1st Road, Kaohsiung City 807, Taiwan
    • Tel.: +886 7 3121101x2157; fax: +886 7 3210637.
  • ,
  • Wen-Jen Chang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ta-Hwa Institute of Technology, No. 1 Ta-Hwa Road, Hsiung-Lin, Hsinchu County, 307, Taiwan
    • Tel.: +886 3 5927700x2959; fax: +886 3 5926848.

Received 19 May 2005; received in revised form 15 November 2005; accepted 20 December 2005.

Abstract 

Objectives

This study investigated the mechanical interactions of implant-teeth splinting systems under different periodontal supports and number of splinted teeth with rigid and non-rigid connectors using non-linear finite element (FE) approach.

Methods

Two FE models with normal and compromised periodontal supports containing a Frialit-2 implant splinted to the first and second premolars were constructed. Non-linear contact elements were used to simulate a realistic interface fixation within the implant system and the sliding function of the non-rigid connector. ANOVA was used to test for relative importance of the investigated factors and main effects for each level of the three investigated factors (periodontal supports, teeth splinting and connector designs) in terms of the stress values were performed.

Results

The simulated results indicated that the cross-interaction of the periodontal support and the splinting situation was a major factor affecting the stress value in alveolar bone. An additional splinting decreased the stress values of bone significantly for a compromised periodontal support. The individual factor of periodontal support also influenced the stress found in the alveolar bone (28%) and implant (72%), and the stress values increased when the periodontal support was reduced. Using different connectors affected the stresses found in bone (15%), implant (21%) and prosthesis (99%). The stress values of the implant and prosthesis increased, but were decreased in bone when the splinting system used non-rigid connectors. The mobility of natural teeth and the implant system between non-rigid and rigid connections showed only small differences.

Conclusions

A non-rigid connector should be used with caution since it breaks the stress transfer and increases the unfavorable stress values in the implant system and prosthesis. The tooth/implant-supported system with an additional splinting is more efficient in compromised periodontal supports.

Keywords: Periodontal support, Connectors, Finite element analysis, Splinting, Biomechanics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(05)00222-8

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2005.12.011

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 9 , Pages 682-691, October 2006