Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 9 , Pages 641-647, October 2006

Effect of reducing frequency of augmented feedback on manual dexterity training and its retention

  • E. Wierinck

      Affiliations

    • Selfteaching and Skills Training Centre, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-facial Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +32 16 332308; fax: +32 16 332435.
  • ,
  • V. Puttemans

      Affiliations

    • Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • D. van Steenberghe

      Affiliations

    • Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-facial Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Received 8 September 2005; received in revised form 30 November 2005; accepted 6 December 2005.

Abstract 

Objective

The study addressed the impact of the frequency of tutorial-enriched augmented visual feedback, provided by a virtual simulation system (DentSim™), on the skill acquisition for a cavity preparation task in novice dental students.

Methods

Thirty-six subjects were assigned to two training groups and a control group. The task consisted of a geometrical cross preparation on the lower left first molar. All subjects performed a pre-test to assess their basic skill level. The training groups received simulation feedback, enriched with tutorial information, across acquisition. One group trained under continuous augmented feedback, while a second group trained under an intermittent (66% of the time) feedback. At both 1-day and 4-month interval, subjects performed a retention test to explore learning specific effects. Two transfer tests were added to assess the extrapolation of the learned skills to an adjacent molar. All tests were performed in the absence of feedback. A control group performed all the tests, without preceding training. All preparations were graded by the simulation system.

Results

The training groups performed similarly across acquisition and improved with practice (ANOVA, P<0.001). After 1 day and 4 months of no practice, the training groups outperformed the control group on a retention test (ANOVA, P<0.001) and transfer test (ANOVA, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Performance and learning of a cavity preparation task on a simulation unit was independent of the frequency of tutorial-enriched augmented visual feedback within the range tested. Training sessions on a simulation unit could be alternated with training sessions in the traditional phantom head laboratory.

Keywords: Virtual reality, Manual dexterity, Skill acquisition, Augmented feedback, Retention, Transfer, Dental training

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(05)00216-2

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2005.12.005

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 9 , Pages 641-647, October 2006