Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 5 , Pages 343-351 , May 2006

Influence of enamel wetness on resin composite restorations using various dentine bonding agents: Part I—effects on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation

  • Shu-Fen Chuang

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC
    • Department of Dentistry, Institute of Oral Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: + 886 6 2364048/2353535x2788; fax: + 886 6 2766626.
  • ,
  • Chih-Han Chang

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC
  • ,
  • Peter Yaman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Li-Tung Chang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Childhood Education and Nursery, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC

Received 4 May 2005 ,Revised 14 July 2005 ,Accepted 28 July 2005.

References 

  1. Buonocore M, Buonocore M. A simple method of increasing adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34:849–853
  2. Gwinnett AJ, Matsui A. A study of enamel adhesives. The physical relationship between enamel and adhesive. Arch Oral Biol. 1967;12:1615–1620
  3. Myers HM. A study of the ultrastructure of chalky white enamel. J Dent Res. 1955;34:38–43
  4. Siverstone L, Hicks M, Featherstons M. Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces: an SEM study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;110:329–332
  5. Barghi N, Knight G, Berry T. Comparing two methods of moisture control in bonding to enamel. Oper Dent. 1992;22:47–49
  6. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Mashhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substance. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982;16:265–273
  7. Kanca JIII, Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int. 1992;23:39–41
  8. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent. 1992;5:127–129
  9. Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with tree new bonding agents. J Esth Dent. 1998;10:296–304
  10. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SHY. Relation between water content in acetone/alcohol-based primer and interfacial ultrastructure. J Dent. 1998;26:147–156
  11. Inagaki A, Chigira H, Itoh K, Wakumoto S. Effects of self-etching primers on dentin. Dent Mater. 1989;5:403–407
  12. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent. 1999;27:523–530
  13. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs. phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent. 1999;24:172–180
  14. Swift E, Triolo P. Bond strength of scotchbond multi-purpose to moist dentin and enamel. Am J Dent. 1992;5:318–320
  15. Walls AWG, Lee J, McCabe JF. The bonding of composite resin to moist enamel. Br Dent J. 2001;191:148–150
  16. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, De Angelis M, Scribante A, Klersy C. Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2003;123:633–640
  17. Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, Iwata S, Nishitani Y. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin-enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:528–533
  18. Shore R, Robinson C, Kirkham J, Brookes SJ. Structure of mature enamel. In:  Robinson C,  Kirkham J,  Shore R editor. Dental enamel. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995;p. 151–166
  19. Jørgensen KD, Asmussen E, Shimokobe H. Enamel damages caused by contracting restorative resins. Scand J Dent Res. 1975;83:120–122
  20. Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. The effects of various clinical factors on marginal enamel micro-cracks produced around composite restoration. Dent Mater J. 1990;11:26–37
  21. Luo Y, Lo ECM, Wei SHY, Tay Fr. Comparison of pulse activation vs. conventional light-curing on marginal adaptation of a compomer conditioned using a total-etch or a self-etch technique. Dent Mater. 2002;18:36–48
  22. Øilo G, Jørgensen KD. Effect of beveling on occurrence of fractures in the enamel surrounding composite resin fillings. J Oral Rehabil. 1977;4:305–309
  23. Walker BN, Makinson OF, Peters MC. Enamel cracks. The role of enamel lamellae in caries initiation. Aust Dent J. 1998;43:110–116
  24. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum of acid-conditioned dentin following the application of a water-based adhesive. Dent Mater. 1998;14:329–338
  25. Jain P, Stewart GP. Effect of dentine primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel. Oper Dent. 2000;25:51–58
  26. Moll K, Gartner T, Haller B. Effect of moist bonding on composite/enamel bond strength. Am J Dent. 2002;15:85–90
  27. Gregoire GL, Akon BA, Millas A. Interfacial micromorphological differences in hybrid layer formation between water- and solvent-based dentin bonding systems. J Pros Dent. 2002;87:633–641
  28. Spencer P, Wang Y, Walker MP, Wieliczka DM, Swafford JR. Interfacial chemistry of the dentin/adhesive bond. J Dent Res. 2000;79:1458–1463
  29. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I. Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001;17:296
  30. Leloup G, D'Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J. Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res. 2001;80(1605):14
  31. Wahab FK, Shaini FJ, Morgano SM. The effect of thermocycling on microleakage of several commercially available composite Class V restorations in vitro. J Pros Dent. 2003;90:168–174
  32. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Hsieh DB. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on class II composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2004;29:301–308
  33. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G. KASEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1997;13:192–197

PII: S0300-5712(05)00152-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.006

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 5 , Pages 343-351 , May 2006