Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 3 , Pages 252-259 , March 2006

Efficacy of composite surface sealers in sealing cavosurface marginal gaps

  • Paulo H. D'Alpino

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
    • ,
  • José C. Pereira

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
    • ,
  • Frederick A. Rueggeberg

      Affiliations

    • Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th Street, Room AD 3265A, 30912-1260 Augusta, GA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 706 721 3354; fax: +1 706 721 8349.
    • ,
  • Nádia R. Svizero

      Affiliations

    • Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade do Sagrado Coração, Bauru, SP, Brazil
    • ,
  • Katsuya Miyake

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
    • ,
  • David H. Pashley

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA

Received 31 March 2005 ,Revised 20 June 2005 ,Accepted 21 June 2005.

References 

  1. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. American Journal of Dentistry. 2002;15:279–289
  2. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in Class V cavities. American Journal of Dentistry. 2003;16:239–243
  3. Obici AC, Sinhoreti MA, de Goes MF, Consani S, Sobrinho LC. Effect of the photo-activation method on polymerization shrinkage of restorative composites. Operative Dentistry. 2002;27:192–198
  4. Jacobsen T, Soderholm KJ, Yang M, Watson TF. Effect of composition and complexity of dentin-bonding agents on operator variability—analysis of gap formation using confocal microscopy. European Journal of Oral Science. 2003;111:523–528
  5. Duke ES. The science and practice of dental adhesive systems. Compendium of Continuum Education in Dentistry. 2003;24:417–419[see also p. 421, 423–4, quiz 425]
  6. Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PN, Kanemura N, Morigami M, Tagami J, et al. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. Journal of Dental Research. 1999;78:906–911
  7. Ramos RP, Chinelatti MA, Chimello DT, Dibb RG. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems. Quintessence International. 2002;33:450–456
  8. Ferdianakis K. Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 1998;22:221–229
  9. Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Dibb RG, Mondelli J. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of Class V composite resin restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:448–453
  10. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Surface energy characteristics of adhesive monomers. Dental Materials. 1998;14:21–28
  11. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on wear resistance of luting agents. Quintessence International. 1994;25:767–771
  12. Leinfelder KF. Using composite resin as a posterior restorative material. Journal of American Dental Association. 1991;122:65–70
  13. Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on composite wear. Dental Materials. 1993;9:108–113
  14. Torstenson B, Brannstrom M. Contraction gap under composite resin restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Operative Dentistry. 1988;13:24–31
  15. Tjan AH, Bergh BH, Lidner C. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992;67:62–66
  16. O'Brien WJ, Fan PL, Apostolides A. Penetrativity of sealants and glazes. The effectiveness of a sealant depends on its ability to penetrate into fissures. Operative Dentistry. 1978;3:51–56
  17. Swift EJ, Triolo PT, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. American Journal of Dentistry. 1996;9:100–104
  18. May KN, Swift EJ, Wilder AD, Futrell SC. Effect of a surface sealant on microleakage of Class V restorations. American Journal of Dentistry. 1996;9:133–136
  19. Antonson SA, Yazici AR, Okte Z, Villalta P, Antonson D, Hardigan P. Effect of resealing on microleakage in relationship to margin design. 82nd IADR/AADR/CADR, Honolulu, Hawaii. 2004;
  20. Munro GA, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded Class 5 composite resin restorations. Operative Dentistry. 1996;21:203–208
  21. Erhardt MC, Magalhaes CS, Serra MC. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2002;27:396–402
  22. Garcia-Godoy F, Malone WF. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations after rebonding. Compendium of Continuum Education in Dentistry. 1987;8:606–609
  23. Tjan AH, Tan DE. Microleakage at gingival margins of Class V composite resin restorations rebonded with various low-viscosity resin systems. Quintessence International. 1991;22:565–573
  24. Lee Y. Modern methods of restorative dentistry. 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company; 1982;[p. 27–29]
  25. Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. European Journal of Oral Science. 1997;105:97–116

PII: S0300-5712(05)00136-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.06.010

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 3 , Pages 252-259 , March 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution