Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions

References 

1. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heyman HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dentistry. 1994;22:195–207
2. Smales RJ, Gerke DC. Clinical evaluation of light-cured anterior resin composites over periods of up to 4 years. Am J Dentistry. 1992;5:208–211
3. Browning WD, Dennison WD. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations. Operative Dentistry. 1996;21:160–166
   • MEDLINE
4. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results. Am J Dentistry. 2001;14:153–156
5. Duke ES, Robbins JW, Snyder DS. Clinical evaluation of a dentinal adhesive system: three-year results. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:889–895
   • MEDLINE
6. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious class V lesions. Operative Dentistry. 2000;25:46–50
   • MEDLINE
7. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1690–1702
   • MEDLINE
8. Kubo S, Nakasa R, Hayashi Y. Survival analysis of resin composite and cast restorations. Jpn J Conservative Dentistry. 2001;44:802–809
9. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. In:  Momoi Y editors. Modern Trends in Adhesive Dentistry. Proceedings of the Adhesive Dentistry Forum 1999 in Tsurumi, Yokohama, Japan. Osaka: Kuraray Co., Ltd; 2000;p. 153–164
10. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of self-etching primer systems after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dentistry. 2001;14:163–169
11. Swift EJ, Perdigão J, Wilder AD, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:1117–1123
    • MEDLINE
12. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Operative Dentistry. 2003;28:215–235
    • MEDLINE
13. Finger WJ. Dentin bonding agents. Relevance of in vitro investigations. Am J Dentistry. 1988;1:184–188
14. Duke ES. Clinical studies of adhesive systems. Operative Dentistry. 1992;(Suppl. 3):103–110
15. Van Dijken JWV. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. J Dentistry. 2000;16:285–291
16. Sata Y, Kubo S, Yokota H, Watanabe T, Hayashi Y. Effect of enamel etching with phosphoric acid on marginal sealing of cervical resin composite restorations. Jpn J Conservative Dentistry. 1999;42:909–918
17. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dentistry. 1998;28:1–20
18. Yokota H, Sata Y, Kubo S, Hayashi Y. Effect of enamel bevel on microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. Jpn J Conservative Dentistry. 1999;42:982–988
19. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. The effect of flexural load cycling on the microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2001;26:451–459
    • MEDLINE
20. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Bond strengths and microleakage of new adhesive systems. In:  Yoshiyama M editors. Modern Trends in Adhesive Dentistry. Proceedings of the Adhesive Dentistry Forum 2001 in Okayama, Japan. Tokyo: Kuraray Medical Inc; 2002;p. 15–30
21. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Effect of low-viscosity resin-based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations. Am J Dentistry. 2003;16:244–248
22. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. The effect of enamel bevel on the microleakage of cervical resin composites. Transactions of Fourth International Congress on Dental Materials. 2002;[p. 252 (Abstr. No. 117)]
23. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Microleakage of cervical cavities restored with flowable composites. Am J Dentistry. 2004;17:33–37
24. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. The effect of light-curing modes on the microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. J Dentistry. 2004;32:254–257
25. Platt JA, Winkler MM, Matis BA, Moore BK. Correlation of dentin adhesive laboratory and clinical performance at two years. J Dent Res. 1997;76:184;[Abstr. No. 1368]
26. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122:41–47
    • MEDLINE
27. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-tech dental adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:775–784
    • MEDLINE
28. McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Johnson GH. Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:593–599
    • MEDLINE
29. Ripps A, Burgess J, Rappold A. Clinical evaluation of self-etching primer with compomer restorative material. J Dent Res. 2000;79:273;[Abstr. No. 1035]
30. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW, Cavel WT, Dilorenzio SC. Clinical evaluation of a compomer restorative material. J Dent Res. 2002;81:A-52;(Abstr. No. 193)]
31. Boghosian A. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive: 1 year results. J Dent Res. 2002;81:A-52;[Abstr. No. 192]
32. Brackett WW, Dib A, Brackett MG, Reyes AA, Estrada BE. Two-year clinical performance of class V resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite restorations. Operative Dentistry. 2003;28:477–481
    • MEDLINE
33. Van Dijken JWV. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. Am J Dentistry. 2004;17:27–32
34. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW, Triolo PT, Cavel WT. Three-year clinical evaluation of the clearfil liner bond 2 system. J Dent Res. 2000;79:B-272;[Abstr. No. 1030]
35. Baratieri LN, Canabarro S, Lopes GC, Ritter AV. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of class V composite restorations: three-year results. Operative Dentistry. 2003;28:482–487
    • MEDLINE
36. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Lambrechts P. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. J Dent Res. 2003;82:126;[Abstr. No. 911]
37. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Three-year clinical evaluation of one-step in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dentistry. 2002;15:309–311
38. Akimoto N, Takamizu M, Kohno A. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer system—seven year results. Jpn J Conservative Dentistry. 2000;43:1268–1277
39. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontologica Scand. 1997;55:58–63
40. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dentistry. 2001;29:317–324
41. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dentistry. 1999;27:523–530
42. Kida K, Momoi Y, Kohno A. Bond strength of LINER BOND II Σ to ground human enamel. Jpn J Conservative Dentistry. 1998;41:[Autumn Special Issue: 106 (Abstr. P-6)]
43. Horiguchi S, Yamada T, Inokoshi S, Fujitani M, Takatsu T. Irritation effect of current resin bonding systems on oral mucous membrane. Jpn J Conservative Dentistry. 1995;38:679–684
44. American Dental Association—Council on Scientific Affairs. Acceptance Program Guidelines—Restorative Materials; March 1996 (available at: http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/positions/standards/guide_restormaterials.pdf).