Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 2 , Pages 89-96, February 2006

Performance of methods of occlusal caries detection in permanent teeth under clinical and laboratory conditions

  • Alessandra Reis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials and Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, Rua Getúlio Vargas, 2225 Joacaba, SC, Brazil
  • ,
  • Fausto Medeiros Mendes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Lineu Prestes, 2227 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Departamento de Odontopediatria, Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Lineu Prestes, 2227 CEP, 05508-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Tel./fax: +55 11 3091 7835.
  • ,
  • Vivian Angnes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials and Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, Rua Getúlio Vargas, 2225 Joacaba, SC, Brazil
  • ,
  • Gisele Angnes

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials and Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, Rua Getúlio Vargas, 2225 Joacaba, SC, Brazil
  • ,
  • Rosa Helena Miranda Grande

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Lineu Prestes, 2227 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • ,
  • Alessandro Dourado Loguercio

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dental Materials and Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, Rua Getúlio Vargas, 2225 Joacaba, SC, Brazil

Received 2 February 2005; received in revised form 18 March 2005; accepted 16 April 2005.

Summary 

Objectives

To compare performance of visual inspection and Laser fluorescence methods to detect occlusal caries lesions under clinical and laboratory conditions in permanent teeth.

Methods

One hundred and ten sites in 57 third molars scheduled for extraction were examined with visual inspection and laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent) device by two trained examiners. After the extraction, teeth were re-examined. Then, teeth were sectioned to perform histological validation. Best cut-off points were calculated with ROC analysis, and sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated at D2 and D3 thresholds. Comparisons between the methods and conditions of examination were performed using McNemar test. Inter-examiner agreement in the same conditions and agreement between the methods performed in vivo and in vitro conditions were assessed by Kappa test. Laser fluorescence values obtained in two conditions were compared with Wilcoxon test.

Results

No difference was observed with visual inspection in both conditions. Laser fluorescence performed in vitro presented higher specificity and accuracy at D3 threshold. Visual inspection showed higher reproducibility. After adjustment of cut-off points for laser fluorescence method, there was no difference between the evaluated parameters.

Conclusion

Only slightly differences were observed between the examinations performed under clinical and laboratory conditions in the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent teeth.

Keywords: Diagnosis, Visual inspection, Laser fluorescence, Occlusal dental caries, Permanent teeth

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-5712(05)00097-7

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2005.04.002

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 34, Issue 2 , Pages 89-96, February 2006