Journal of Dentistry
Volume 30, Issue 4 , Pages 141-146 , May 2002

Glass ionomer microleakage from preparations by an Er/YAG laser or a high-speed handpiece

  • Brian C Quo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatric Dentistry, 337A College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL 60612 7212, USA
    • ,
  • James L Drummond

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry m/c 555, 337A College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL 60612 7212, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-312-413-3790; fax: +1-312-996-3535
    • ,
  • Anne Koerber

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatric Dentistry, 337A College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL 60612 7212, USA
    • ,
  • Shahrbanoo Fadavi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatric Dentistry, 337A College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL 60612 7212, USA
    • ,
  • Indru Punwani

      Affiliations

    • Department of Paediatric Dentistry, 337A College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, 801 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL 60612 7212, USA

Received 1 September 2001 ,Revised 15 July 2002 ,Accepted 26 July 2002.

References 

  1. Wigdor HA, Abt E, Ashrafi S, Walsh JT. The effect of lasers on dental hard tissues. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993;124:65–70
  2. Stern RH, Vahl J, Sognnaes RF. Lased enamel: ultrastructural observations of pulsed carbon dioxide laser effects. J Dent Res. 1972;51:455–460
  3. Hibst R, Keller U. Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on the dental hard substances: measurement of ablation rates. Lasers Surg Med. 1989;9:338–344
  4. Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Otsuki M, et al.  Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res. 1998;77(6):1404–1414
  5. Crisp S, Lewis B, Wilson AD. Glass-ionomer cement chemistry of erosion. J Dent Res. 1976;55:1032–1041
  6. Donavan TE, Daftary F. Clinical use of glass ionomer restorative materials. Compendium Continuing Education Dent. 1987;8:180
  7. McLean LW, Wilson AD. The clinical development of the glass ionomer cements: I. Formulation and properties. Aust Dent J. 1977;22:31–36
  8. Jordan RE, Suzuki M, McLean DF. Light-cured glass ionomers. Esthetic Dent. 1989;1:59–61
  9. Erdilek N, Ozata F, Sepetcioglu F. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1997;21(4):311–314
  10. Koprulu H, Gurgan S, Onen A. Marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material: an investigation of placement techniques. Quintessence Int. 1995;26(10):729–732
  11. Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer. Oper Dent. 1992;17:7–12
  12. Asmussen E, Jorgensen KD. A microscopic investigation of the adaptation of some plastic filling materials to dental cavity walls. Acta Odontol Scand. 1972;30:3–21
  13. Hallett KB, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: an in vitro study. Dent Mater. 1993;9:306–311
  14. Alperstein KS, Graver HT, Herold RCB. Marginal leakage of glass ionomer cement restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:803–807
  15. Gordon M, Plasschaert AJM, Stark M. Microleakage of several tooth-colored restorative materials in cervical cavities: a comparative study in vitro. Dent Mater. 1986;2:228–231
  16. Wieczkowski G, Joynt RB, Davis EL, et al.  Leakage patterns associated with glass-ionomer based resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1992;17(1):21–25
  17. Wendt SL, McInnes PM, Dickinson GL. The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater. 1992;8(3):181–184
  18. Rossomando KJ, Wendt SL. Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater. 1995;11(1):47–51
  19. Doerr CL, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. Effect of thermocycling on the microleakage of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent. 1996;9:19–21
  20. Crim GA. Effect of substrate age on microleakage of dentin adhesive agents. J Oral Rehabil. 1989;16(6):555–557
  21. Crim GA, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage: the effect of storage and cycling duration. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57(5):574–576
  22. Brackett WW, Gunnin TD, Conkin JE. Microleakage of light cured glass-ionomer restorative materials. Quintessence Int. 1995;26(8):583–586
  23. Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Sealing capacity of a resin modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in class V restorations. Oper Dent. 1996;21:67–72
  24. Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater. 2001;17:340–346
  25. Niu W, Noriko Eto J, Kimura Y, et al.  A study on microleakage after resin filling of class v cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1998;16(4):227–231
  26. Wright GZ, McConnell RJ, Keller U. Microleakage of class V composite restorations prepared conventionally with those prepared with an Er:YAG laser: a pilot study. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15(6):425–426
  27. Thornton JB, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Marginal leakage of two glass ionomer cements: Ketac Fil and Ketac Silver. Am J Dent. 1988;1:35–38
  28. Tsunekawa M, Setcos JC, Usami Y, et al.  A new light activated adhesive composite: shear bond strength and microleakage. Dent Mater. 1992;8:234–237
  29. Salama FS. Microleakage and marginal gap formation of glass ionomer resin restorations. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1995;20(1):31–36
  30. Cooley RL, Robbins JW. Glass ionomer microleakage in class V restorations. General Dent. 1988;36:113–115
  31. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contractions of composite and glass ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59:297–300

PII: S0300-5712(02)00011-8

Journal of Dentistry
Volume 30, Issue 4 , Pages 141-146 , May 2002

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution